Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiitupandown/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

[]

[]

this article has a long history of sock puppets. please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Peacebigline/Archive

these are either sockpuppets or meat puppets, but either way they are not here for any reason even close to making an encyclopedia Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

[] talk page comment from blocked sock - "has a so much powerful authority like a GOD" + "Never allowed another side comments"

[] talk page comment from suspected sock - " Are you guys really God in this website"

[] talk page comment from suspected sock - " I will not change your side information."

both editors make comments, suggesting that other editors think they are godlike. both editors make comments, referring to "sides" in a dispute. both editors erm...(polite mode) lack certain English communication skills that a native speaker would find easy. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - What does it mean please see WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/Peacebigline/Archive? Do you think these are sock of Peacebigline? If so, then why is this report here and not at WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/Peacebigline? The diffs no. 1 & 2 that you provided are not similar. Is there some stronger evidence?   Vanjagenije   (talk)  21:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No response after 15 days. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)