Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiuser999120/Archive

Report date December 30 2009, 12:33 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Regancy42 (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Regancy42 (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * All are already blocked. I don't think any more has to me done. NW ( Talk ) 17:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by SoCalSuperEagle
User:The_free_encyclopedia_2010 and User:Free wiki editor 111 have already been confirmed as socks of User:Wikiuser999120. The only edit made by User:Free wiki editor 112 restored edit(s) made by User:Free wiki editor 111 at Talk:List of ChuckleVision episodes. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, per the user creation log, the User:Free wiki editor 112, User:Free wiki editor 113, User:Free wiki editor 114, User:Free wiki editor 115, User:Free wiki editor 116, and User:Free wiki editor 117 accounts were created within a 3-minute span (details). -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 21:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
On the List of ChuckleVision episodes talk page, Wikiuser999120 openly admited that he had willingly created and used sock puppets to dodge a block. Just bringing this to the investigator's attention The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention to check for sleepers and underlying IPs/ranges. Omai. –MuZemike 23:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

One may also wish to look at as well. –MuZemike 23:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

All listed socks ✅, blocked, and tagged. No chance of an IP block, unfortunately. J.delanoy gabs adds 06:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by TreasuryTag
Similar username to all the previous ones (came immediately after Edit contributor 999), similar area of interest, similar editing style, and registered just a day after the last one was blocked. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  presiding officer  ─╢ 12:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims. Hello. I know who Wikiuser999120, because he's my brother, and I believe that all his account's are blocked. I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm not editing on his behalf because he was putting in unsourced material (I know it's either in Chucklevision or List of Chucklevision episodes), but I just want to put in some references for the two articles. I hope this isn't against the rules, and once again I'm not being told what to do by my brother, as I know this is forbidden because I read it in the welcome pages. If what I'm doing is wrong, just tell me. Thank you. Econtrib (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And you created a new account four minutes after posting this. Bad idea. --jpgordon:==( o ) 17:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And, given how you've reacted to being blocked, this "brother" story is a load of bollocks. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
I just added a whole pile of additional likely socks (quack, quack) and blocked Econtrib. I think there may be other sleeper accounts, too, so I think a checkuser should still be completed. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
-, but might be a good idea to check for sleepers. Tim Song (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Everything listed above is certainly a duck candidate; this list might include a few new ones: Most are already blocked, and most of those are already tagged as socks. – Luna Santin  (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)
 * 1)  (MAYBE)

Conclusions
All accounts blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 08:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)