Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WilliamNFlowers/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence is thin; we are talking about two users with 18 total edits between them, but fwiw: There are some notable differences however:
 * 'William' in both usernames
 * WilliamNFlowers:
 * ten career edits (9 Aug-20 Sept), including Academic publishing and one computing article (Data transformation (computing)).
 * every one of their edits is reverted
 * Tywonwilliams12:
 * eight career edits (all 17 Oct), including Academic publishing, and and one computing article (Computing).
 * every one of their edits is reverted
 * REFSPAM is dominant in nearly all of WilliamNFlowers's edits; none in Tywonwilliams12's edits.
 * Diddling the short description in many of Tywonwilliams12's edits, almost none in WilliamNFlowers's edits. Mathglot (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this without action - there isn't enough similarity between the accounts to make the connection. I do note that neither of them have made any constructive edits, so would consider a block as a regular admin action if they continue in the same vein, but I don't see the case for a sockpuppetry block.   Girth Summit  (blether)  09:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)