Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Williamluk atletico/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)
 * (proxy)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar edit history with the sockmaster. The sockmaster also used some open proxies to perform vandalism. 222.167.166.187 (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU won't publicly connect IP's to named accounts. Sro23 (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree with Jayron32's assessment here that the underlying issue here is a content dispute and not vandalism. Editing while logged out in this context is of course less than ideal, but it's not sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I think that the issue is best served by WP:ANI if there is indeed a problem. When I declined at WP:AIV, it was because there was nothing self-evidently bad faith about the editing in question.  If the issue does need investigation, then WP:ANI, with a concise but sufficiently detailed explanation of the problem, is ideal.  -- Jayron 32 12:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar edit history in 222.167.166.187 (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Moved from talk page per edit request of Ip user 222.167.166.187 without comment. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, 222.167.166.187 (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * That perhaps shows the listed account edited while logged out; it does not show anything about the master. I need something connecting to the master before considering running a check. ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

222.167.166.187 (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Edit on behalf of blocked user,  222.167.166.187 (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * to . ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Between the CU result, some slightly divergent interests, and the fact that Willimaluk reverted an edit by Cibba, this looks like two different people to me. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)