Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WillieOnFeels/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Although this user has been blocked for creating vandalism only accounts, I am under this impression that this user have been abusing other pages. In addition, this user have abused under the IP address 208.52.180.172, 208.52.180.173, 208.52.180.174, given that he abused the Bahman Golbarnezhad, replacing his forename with "Batman". Bare this in mind, I do not know who the sockmaster is. Donnie Park (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
for clarity - some of the named accounts are bloody obvious, others are also involved in a recent wave of vandalism on a fairly obscure set of articles which the IPs are also involved in. I've added a bunch more. I suspect there may be several groups involved here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are to each other and to Group 1:
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * The following accounts are ❌ to each other and all the other accounts:
 * Blocked the two unblocked, confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * The following accounts are ❌ to each other and all the other accounts:
 * Blocked the two unblocked, confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ❌ to each other and all the other accounts:
 * Blocked the two unblocked, confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked the two unblocked, confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked the two unblocked, confirmed accounts without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1 and 2 are obvious ducks from usernames and behaviour. Group 3 is harder to call, one account performing the same sort of juvenile vandalism, the other one a spammer. I'm going to call that a separate case. I have a separate suspicion that wasn't confirmed by the technical evidence. Working on tagging now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

- Groups 1 and 2 tagged, and I have created Sockpuppet investigations/ZxchSHS for group 3. Case closed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)