Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Winningjahofficial/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A salt evasion creation of Winning Jah (Musician), and a similarity in the edit summaries (which I can't use diffs for since they're all deleted.) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - There's obviously some accounts missing in this SPI, as the page has been recreated quite a bit. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 21:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The master is . CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * TajuAyinde blocked and tagged. Adding some more accounts for the record. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Super quacking Winning Jah (reggae singer) Requesting CU for sleepers. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The case is. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * - . Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

quack CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * . GABgab 19:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Loud quacking contribs here. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh and these too: Mlex Songz, Sonia Aimy and about a dozen others. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . Please block the new socks indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Dyckoy is an SPA focused on Obaland Awards-related content. This user uploaded a file claiming "own work", with User:Jaynee007 (an obvious sock noted in previous batch) then changing the image description to take credit for it. DMacks (talk) 03:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Given this account having slipped through so far and the >2-year history of this situation that includes some sleeper activity, I request a checksuer to see if there are other sleepers and/or a block of an underlying IP to stop it. DMacks (talk) 03:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Courcelles (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No point in pursuing this further. Closing.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Given the history of socking on articles relating to Winning Jah, please see the more recent comments at Articles for deletion/Winning Jah (2nd nomination) which strongly suggest that the alleged sock is deeply invested in the same articles as the master. I know the master is stale, but is there value in checking for sleepers? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Based on some notes in cuwiki, I'm going to call NOTICE501 to Winningjahofficial.  I keep looking at the edit histories and can't make up my mind if that's enough to block on, so I'll leave the final call to somebody else. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * PS, there's a couple of accounts that could possibly be sleepers, but none that I feel confident enough about to mention by name. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Nobody has seen fit to block in the 2-1/2 weeks since my check. I took another look at the publicly available data and don't see that anything significant has changed, so I'm going to close this.  If further evidence appears, please reopen the case. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)