Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wm5200/Archive

05 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

at User:The Pluton he admits this fact - I would simply guess he/she is not aware of our policy on  subversion of  bans Moxy (talk) 08:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' As far as I can tell,

1. No Wiki admin has helped me with the question of whether I can post two footnotes from Sir Ian Kershaw on “Talk: Death of Adolf Hitler” without violating copy write laws. I have no desire to steal from any author, or other person, and have been asking for assistance since August.

2. No Wiki admin has ever read any part of either footnote. Sir Ian Kershaw appears to be the smartest Englishman on the planet reference Adolf Hitler, possibly the most knowledgeable person in the world (Kierzek excluded, of course). What am I missing, why is this work not only ignored, but possibly suppressed?

3. No Wiki admin has ever made it clear to me how I was “outing” (I’m still uncomfortable with that term) Gwen Gale. Even so, I understand the concept, so I have been careful to not refer to any single electron of Gwen Gale’s existence outside Wiki. Is this still a problem, and if so, how?

4. No Wiki admin has ever accused me of dishonesty or inaccuracy. I stand behind everything I have posted, If something is a problem, I am willing to address the matter. Despite this, I have taken a fair amount of abuse about my actions and motives.

5. No Wiki admin has ever explained to me why I am not able to introduce information which relates to an article. This appears to me to be a huge conflict motivated strictly by the ego of a single admin. Still, as I have been saying since at least 12 August 2010, “I suppose it will be me who gets shut off.

Thank you for your time.The Pluton (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Just as a procedural note, I've moved this case to show Wm5200 as the master. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged The Pluton. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

10 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This is clearly Blocked User:Wm5200 Can we block the IP range? The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Just based on those two IPs, a rangeblock isn't feasible. I've blocked (but not checked) 173.165.48.201 as being an obvious block evader. TN X Man 20:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

28 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User:Heyboowemissyou sent me an email about blocking the IP address, given the recent activity on the IP it's probably worth checking Heyboowemissyou/WM200 for sleepers. On request I'll provide the email for the checkuser/clerk running the case privately. tedder (talk) 00:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I have repeatedly offered to help any admin identify and clean up any socks. You people seem more interested in the process than the content. I know that some of you read the content, you've left hints. But, what the heck, I guess that you are just following orders.

I am posting this from my home computer, which is currently unblocked. I don't know why, some times the edit signs show up, sometimes they don't.

An answer might help, but I rather expect another block, instead. Certainly not an admin's email, that seems prohibited. Later.99.64.15.111 (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The master is stale so we can't check against that, but we can check against this sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ match to, who was blocked as a suspected sock. TN X Man  13:19, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

12 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

v/r - TP 18:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've tagged and blocked the account. This report just needs to be archived.v/r - TP 18:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

23 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

of indef-blocked user Wm5200 has been editing at talk:Death of Adolf Hitler. I wasn't going to do anything, but now he is. Dianna (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't know the background, so while it certaily looks suspicious, I can't confirm that the first diff is in fact an admission. That being said, the IP is clearly trolling, and is active now, so feel free to dole out a block yourself. There's nothing for the SPI team to do here, so I'm closing the SPI case.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)