Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wmplayer/Archive

Evidence submitted by Icestorm815
Users have all made similar types of original research in the same article. ,, Request was made by Mlcaslyn at RFPP to unprotect the same article, citing spelling errors needed to be corrected. (More likely to allow the unconfirmed account to edit the semi-protected article). While I'm fairly certain that the accounts can be blocked on the common submissions alone, I believe that based on the current behavior of the accounts that there are more accounts that belong to sockmaster and a checkuser would be beneficial to root out the existing socks and to address the underlying IP. Icestorm815 •  Talk  06:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Note: Unfortunately, I do not know who the sockmaster is and have listed this case under the most recent sock. Icestorm815 •  Talk  06:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Icestorm815  •  Talk  06:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC) The evidence here is convincing enough to warrant a checkuser. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I've moved this to correspond with the oldest user. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ J.delanoy gabs adds  03:19, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

No action taken. Tim Song (talk) 03:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)