Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Woohoo5241/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Over the last days, there was a discussion in the Cody Rhodes article. Two users (CMChuck and CinnamonCinder ) were blocked because it was a sock. When I went to sleep, the discussion kept going and I was warned by Woohoo, who didn't even participated in the discussion (also, in 2018, a message was removed by Cinnamon ) with several IPs and users making the same editions and arguments      Since there is a previous case of two socks, I want to know if there is more. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CinnamonCinder and CMChuck were already ✅ to each other before this case was raised. I'm persuaded that is the same person. There are a number of similarities - they geolocate to the same city, they were created within a couple of months of each other back in 2004, and for two accounts with just a few hundred edits between them, they overlap at a remarkable number of articles and talk pages, with Woohoo occasionally showing up out of the blue to support Cinnamon (for example at Talk:List of songs recorded by the Beatles back in 2007, or in the last few days over this Cody Rhodes dispute. CC removing a warning from Woohoo's talk page is also a bit of an oddity. I've converted Cinnamon's block into an indef, and have also blocked Woohoo - I'll let someone else work out how to tag them.
 * The other accounts don't appear to be related. No comment on the IPs. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)