Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldofknowledge121/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It is clear that these are two different accounts used by the same person. Both are accounts created on the same day. They made the same argument and mutually supporting arguments in. Therefore, he has proved to be an exaggeration of the Ezhava caste and it is appropriate to prevent these.Worldofknowledge121,Redbutterfly0987 At the same time, both of them have made similar edits on the Itty Achudan, Cheerappanchira pages. Both have made same edits to the page Itty Achudan within same 2 hours gap. See their same edits : and

Kaippally Nishad (talk) 05:12, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * As mentioned above, both accounts were created within 24 hours of each other, and promptly interacted on the same articles (Itty Achudan and Ezhava) pushing similar viewpoints. At the very least, I think this warrants a CU to examine the relationship between the two accounts. I'll also note that is the older of the two accounts, so regardless of the outcome a clerk will probably need to move this case to that name. : To establish any relationship between, based on the diffs provided above. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . The two accounts edit from the same general location. For the most part, they use different phones, but when Worldofknowledge121 created their account, they used the same kind of phone that Redbutterfly0987 ordinarily uses. Mz7 (talk) 03:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this without action. It's possible that they're the same person, per the CU data and their editing style, but I can't rule out the possibility that it's two people who know each other, and who each have an interest in the subject. I see some improvement in their editing, since the latest edit requests from each account have now been accepted, so I'm not sure that there's any ongoing disruption that needs to be stopped. Come back if more evidence emerges.  Girth Summit  (blether)  11:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An IP user from Kalady filed an ANI report concerning repeated complaints about sources they don't like, assuming bad faith, and mincing negative language in relation to the Ezhava people by and. In particular, the users' conduct at talk pages are very similar. For example:
 * Special:Diff/1032759214, Special:Diff/1033058895, and Special:Diff/1032673809 by Theobserver8991 remove negative references to the Ezhava.
 * Special:Diff/1032673809 and Special:Diff/1033053792 by Theobserver8991 remove or euphemize references to lower-caste people, as does Special:Diff/1033074817/1023727884.
 * Talk:Channar_revolt and the next thread by Theobserver8991 make vague complaints about the accuracy and sourcing of the Channar revolt article, as does the section after that by Redbutterfly0987. Talk:Breast_Tax and the subsequent thread by Redbutterfly0987 do the same about Breast Tax's sourcing, along with prior complaints at Special:Diff/1033049039/1033050117 and Special:Diff/1033047413.

During this, I noticed that made similar edits as Redbutterfly0987 at Talk:Ezhava around the same time, such as Talk:Ezhava and Talk:Ezhava, and before that Talk:Ezhava. Worldofknowledge121 even claimed to be the same user as Redbutterfly0987 at Talk:Ezhava. Both users consecutively made an unsourced name change from Itty Achudan to "Itty Achudan Vaidyar", and Worldofknowledge121 also made Special:Diff/1031581472/1013927172, which makes similar euphemisms as Redbutterfly0987 did in Special:Diff/1023727884/1033074817. I filed this report under Worldofknowledge121 because that account was created and edited first.

I think this is a WP:DUCK case, but seek CU verification nonetheless. I recomment blocking two of the three accounts and resolving the underlying content dispute. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 21:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I am sorry, i saw some accusing me , most of the citations given in the articles are regarding recent news articles rather than historical facts. Also i personally feel that the article specifically mentioning names of different communities in every lines,this is inhumane as per my opinion. Also i saw in the previous talk section whenever someone try to correct the information ,its gwtting reverting within seconds. I would like to know the reason behind anyone not being ready to do a scrutinity of the article rather than accusing me. If it is deliberately meant to be in that way please carry on. Thankyou. The whole content is only based on some recent news articles and not supported by any historical unbiased sources. And it is written in an inhumane way to meant to attack some communities. Instead of scrutinising it ,just accusing me of sock puppetry is not done. I saw lot of request and talks regarding this and i supported them since i felt that the concern is so genuine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theobserver8991 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Also i would like to inform you that you are welcome to block or remove me if you think that i am vandalising but before that i would like to know the reason for writing these topics in such a demeaning way ,where 90 percentof the citations are from recent news articles from this decades ,rather than from an unbiased source. Also pointing to certain communities in all the sentences is a part of agenda for some purpose. I saw the history section where all the point regarding correction by others are simply getting deleted by someone.I have no problem in taking fake accusations since i believe that i have truth in my side. but before that please take a look at the misinformation that is spreading through the page and verify it from some unbaised sources rather than from news articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theobserver8991 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Another account Longwaytogo555 is speaking the same way and adding same content.2402:3A80:524:B837:0:52:E156:7C01 (talk) 12:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * They're either the same person or a couple people coordinating; I know that a past case of Worldofknowledge/Redbutterfly was closed without action, but since more accounts are popping up I'm opting to block. Blocked, tagged, closed. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Solely for promoting caste in the same articles. Same conduct and arguments in talk pages.

. 2409:4073:2E8C:EDF1:8471:BA89:DA70:DDF8 (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Bilgiljilll and could confirm with each other. Created on the same month and edits around the same time, overlaps at Nangeli, Arattupuzha Velayudha Panicker, and Itty Achudan. For example, .--2409:4073:392:FBAF:BC0C:7E6C:8920:C90E (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Lots of people argue about caste topics, so just editing overlap doesn't mean much.  This case is long stale (over a year), so running CU is pointless and I don't see enough to block on the behavioral evidence. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)