Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xeyow/Archive

09 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Self-coup attracted much IP attention after a coup in the Maldives. Following page protection the above users have appeared as single topic editors always removing the same referenced information without plausible explanation as at, and.  Velella  Velella Talk 17:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ziansh is the oldest account, but as it's 5 years old, accusations of sockpuppetry against long-term editors are not to be taken lightly. I would like to see more evidence how the accounts are the same. WilliamH (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This article is misleading and with twisted facts. The Common Wealth, European Union, United States, India and the majority of the Maldivian people - all these people- are right now in the process of getting an impartial investigation into the coup brought by the mutinous police/military backed by the same regime which ruled for 30 long years. Most of the people and international community labels those long years to be ruled with an 'iron fist' and was a dictatorship. So how come such biased articles with twisted facts are being allowed in Wiki? Can't Wiki just verify the facts first? Or is Wiki on the payroll of the tycoons of the Maldives who are clearly in the videos of the coup leading it?
 * I am content to remove Ziansh from the list with apologies for the suggested inclusion - but the problem remains with IP 112.134.208.63 making identical edits to Yambe88 now that the page is no longer protected and Xeyow continuing major reversions without edit summaries.  Velella  Velella Talk  19:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This article is misleading and with twisted facts. The Common Wealth, European Union, United States, India and the majority of the Maldivian people - all these people- are right now in the process of getting an impartial investigation into the coup brought by the mutinous police/military backed by the same regime which ruled for 30 long years. Most of the people and international community labels those long years to be ruled with an 'iron fist' and was a dictatorship. So how come such biased articles with twisted facts are being allowed in Wiki? Can't Wiki just verify the facts first? Or is Wiki on the payroll of the tycoons of the Maldives who are clearly in the videos of the coup leading it?
 * I have had a detailed review of the editing history both before, during and after page protection and I cannot be certain that this is sockpuppetry, Meat puppets almost certainly but it would be improper to pursue a report whilst some doubt remains. May I therefore withdraw this report.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * In that case, I'll mark for close. If you choose to move forward with this in the future, please feel free to refile. TN X Man  14:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)