Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xffgs/Archive

09 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * note this user made the same edit a month ago and hasn't edit since. Likely a sock too, but might be considered stale.
 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
 * note this user made the same edit a month ago and hasn't edit since. Likely a sock too, but might be considered stale.
 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The 3 of them are new accounts making the same edit against censuses to List of Phineas and Ferb characters JDDJS (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC) If the checkuser request is removed, would this go faster? because (s)he is just making more socks as this goes on. JDDJS (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All accounts have been ✅ and blocked. List of Phineas and Ferb characters has been semi-protected 1 week as a result. –MuZemike 23:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

24 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Seems to have a similar editing pattern. Made the same edit to List of Phineas and Ferb characters that the other socks of Xffgs did. Also spammed my talk page, which would make sense because I got Xffgs blocked in the first place. Even before they made the edit to the character page, I noticed similarities to the edits by the Isabella account JDDJS (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Er, everyone's blocked.. but maybe a CU to find sleepers? Is this part of a larger sockfarm? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, no sleepers. TN X Man  14:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

10 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Vandalized my page and has been editing Phineas and Ferb pages just like in the past. On a side note, it turns out that the real sockpuppeter is User:Isabella and Lego Liker and Xffgs is just a puppet. JDDJS (talk) 23:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

All these accounts are already blocked indef for sockpuppetry, so I don't really think this needs to be here.... Can a clerk close it up please? MacMedtalk stalk 23:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Eh, I'll endorse for sleepers on this one. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * - Tiptoety  talk 07:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Closing; assuming Tiptoety performed whatever actions may have been necessary Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 08:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)