Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xkcdreader/Archive

01 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Xkcdreader has been trying to disrupt heavily debating at Talk:Star Trek Into Darkness by bringing up the film title's grammar while other users have made it clear that the discussion is about something else completely. I suspect s/he's using this account to further his/her cause. FallingGravity (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This accusation is in bad faith. I am not nor am I using/have any other accounts. I am not trying to disrupt anything, and to say so is a personal attack. Furthermore, I do not have "a cause" and to believe so is silly. I think the Star Trek Into Darkness page should mention that the title is grammatically confusing. Plain and simple. Please check and delete this unfounded claim. Is two people agreeing really a legitimate reason to claim they are the same person? Xkcdreader (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

I would like to amend my comment with the following: the user accused of being my sockpuppet (Jonahx) was arguing against me. I find it absurd that I am accused of sitting around and debating my own points. Xkcdreader (talk) 07:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, so now you two disagree, lol. Well let me explain: After some users give you advice, Jonahx inserts a large block of text about how the title should work grammatically, and you write "I think people who participated in the initial debate/are regular wikipedia editors will be biased against inclusion. I can see why wikipedia regulars would want to hide this. Nsign flat out said it. Fresh eyes from outside the wikipedia realm are necessary." To me it wasn't clear who you were addressing and given Jonahx's recent account creation, I assumed it was him. Other comments I found suspicious was how Jonahx would insert large blocks of text after someone asked you about WP:MULTIPLE, apparently allowing you to handwave the initial allegation and continue on Jonahx's thread. FallingGravity (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this as no evidence has been provided that these two accounts are operated by the same person. Given the amount of attention this talk page has gotten recently, it is no surprise that newbies would descend upon it. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)