Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xxxx693/Archive

23 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Xxxx693 has had several run-ins with me at Quique Flores, when he was anon. Both have declined to enter the pertinent WP:FOOTY and talkpage conversations, also not answering my messages and repeatedly calling me a vandal. Now, the new account (i don't need any proof so blatant this is, but still ask for the checkuser please), User:Lombriz de Aguapuerca, returned to the Quique Flores page, undid me, was reverted (not by me) then proceeded to vandalize my userpage (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:VascoAmaral&diff=446252605&oldid=446252541).

Amazingly enough, my page (to the best of my knowledge), it was protected indef. Attentively, --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Both the named accounts have been used for tagteam edit warring on Quique Flores. I believe a checkuser is warranted. Thank you. — Satori Son 19:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Without commenting on the IPs, the following named accounts appear to be technical matches to each other:
 * It appears that on at least one occasion, Lombriz edited Scoelho86's userpage. Scoelho reverted and warned Lombriz for it, but they were using the same IP and computer. I'm not sure what they're playing at. TN X Man  20:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, very confusing - especially when Vasco confirms that Scoelho has been supportive + helpful towards him, while the other editors have attacked him. If not a technical fault, maybe it's a case of WP:LITTLEBROTHER? I desperately want to AGF here... GiantSnowman 00:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Behavoir is not 100% matching, and going on the basis that the Checkuser could be partly right, it still doesn't add up to a block for me. Requesting review of another clerk. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  22:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Scoelho86 is a pretty old account, dating back to 2007. Xxxx, by comparison, is pretty new. I have a feeling they're not the same person; it just doesn't seem to match up. Anyway, I'll close for now, but report any suspicious behavior, I guess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, very confusing - especially when Vasco confirms that Scoelho has been supportive + helpful towards him, while the other editors have attacked him. If not a technical fault, maybe it's a case of WP:LITTLEBROTHER? I desperately want to AGF here... GiantSnowman 00:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Behavoir is not 100% matching, and going on the basis that the Checkuser could be partly right, it still doesn't add up to a block for me. Requesting review of another clerk. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  22:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Scoelho86 is a pretty old account, dating back to 2007. Xxxx, by comparison, is pretty new. I have a feeling they're not the same person; it just doesn't seem to match up. Anyway, I'll close for now, but report any suspicious behavior, I guess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)