Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YLHamdani/Archive

Report date May 6 2009, 16:08 (UTC)
*
 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Fences and windows (talk)

YLHamdani was blocked on 19 March for vandalism and impersonation on the article Yasser Latif Hamdani. The user was adding a claim that Hamdani is an Ahmadi. See User talk:YLHamdani.

The only edit by HamdaniYL has been to re-add this claim:. Pakistanimuslim's only edit:. Yasser Hamdani's only edit:. These are obvious sockpuppets to evade a block.

Fences and windows (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

EDIT: Two have already been blocked as sockpuppets. Fences and windows (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Blocked and tagged.  Syn  ergy 17:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Syn  ergy 17:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

making problematic edits, same editing pattern. see the talk page User talk:Egopearl. 119.160.119.198 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I have copied and pasted this here at the request of IP119. I do not know if this is kosher. A knowledgeable user is welcome to reformat or remove as necessary. --Izno (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The case is. CU declined. There's also been no evidence presented in support of a behavioral block.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  21:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging IPs doesn't work, and the IP hasn't edited since filing this report. Closing for insufficient evidence. Bbb23 (talk) 12:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)