Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yassmine.muhammad/Archive

30 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Vandalizing in page Sati (practice) by Jordan schlansky Similar to:- by 189.226.157.144 by Yassmine.muhammad OccultZone (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The edits aren't vandalism. OccultZone's own edits to this article include misrepresenting a source to say the exact opposite of its meaning. Itsmejudith (talk) 10:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC) In this edit, OccultZone uses an academic text to say that "sati" increased as a result of Muslim rule in India. Actually, the source clearly describes this as the view of a group of extremist pseudohistorians. Itsmejudith (talk) 11:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * He actually vandalized, since he's blanking and edit warring. OccultZone (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Alleged puppet has only one edit. Insufficient evidence to link it to Jordan. Bbb23 (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

05 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

, ], Similar vandalism, on same page like he did before with 2-3 other identities. OccultZone (talk) 12:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Since each of his sock are finally SPA they edit only single page. OccultZone (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'll close this: Amalthea 12:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * First of all, I don't agree that the diffs you provided are vandalistic (WP:VANDALISM).
 * You have not shown in what way the edits are similar. Being of a similar opinion, or both opposing your views, is not sufficient.
 * I do agree that both the Jordan Schlansky and the Canto55 account don't appear to be new to the English Wikipedia. That gives me pause, but there are enough differences between the two that at the moment I think they are different people -- but it's hard to say with just a few edits.
 * Either way I don't necessarily see abuse of multiple accounts here, or sufficient indication with those two accounts, particularly when considering that there doesn't seem to be any disruption.
 * No other admin seems to either, and it's been 2.5 weeks since this case was opened