Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zabranos/Archive

26 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I therefore ask you to consider my predicament and accede to my humble request to check these two accounts. I remain. Shiite (talk) 12:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) User:Nanner-Nanner was created on 20 September 2013 and one of its first edit(s) was supporting User:Zabranos's suggestion at Talk:Fatimah – the one and only support comment in that section.
 * 2) Zabranos changed the infobox template in the Hujr ibn Adi article on 29 July 2013. I restored it to its previous version on 21 September 2013; and this was later on reverted by Nanner-Nanner on the same day and twice yesterday: (2nd revert) and (3rd revert).
 * 3) Talk:Hujr_ibn_Adi: Nanner-Nanner initiated the discussion in the article's talk page on 23 September 2013 and Zabranos very soon agreed with the former (within 2.5 hours). Plus, besides myself, its only these two accounts that have been participating in the discussion. I later on initiated an RfC (Talk:Hujr_ibn_Adi). Nanner-Nanner reported me to the Admin noticeboard yest at 2044 (UTC) and the admin User:ItsZippy  hastily made a decision at 2119 (UTC) (within 35 minutes!) and protected the page; without giving me the opportunity to defend myself.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is a ✅ sock of --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked the sock indefinitely, and the master 1 week. Legoktm (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)