Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zacharyy/Archive

07 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * The relation with Zacharytheriault was argued in Suspected sock puppets/Zacharyy.
 * Zachsays is a DUCK, I repeat my report at the vandalism notification page: Following the deletion of Alexis Free, see Special:WhatLinksHere/Alexis_Free, the user is building his own world of hoax articles on his userpages.
 * The relation to Ending-start is given at User:Zachsays. That alternative account template on the userpage is not a joke but correct. You can compare the editing times.
 * Ending-start is editing articles, Zachsays is editing this hoax world, interaction between the accounts is little caused by the little article namespace editing of Zachsays. Sounds nutty that someone wastes livetime this way, but thats how it is.


 * Ending-start is a new account of Zacharee

There is no reason to have this user on Wikipedia. Created hoax articles in the past and did nothing but vandalism, maybe he learned something but he is still moonlighting in user namespace thereby abusing Wikipedia to spread false information all over the internet. So evidently he learned nothing, given the hoaxing the user is not trustworthy. -- U79.201.116.159 (talk) 22:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * It appears that Ending-start has made a fresh start under legitimate uses for having sockpuppets. As for Zachsays, since he has specifically stated that it is him and he is not pretending to be another person, I am not sure what the problem is. Since the block of Zacharee and Zacharytheriault, this user has not made any vandalism edits. -- ĈÞЯİŒ  1ооо  23:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have not many any vandalism attempts, and what happened before was a long time ago. I have since became an established user, and contribute to Wikipedia very well. I agree, the Zachsays account is rather odd, but I can assure you I use it of not vandalism, but for test editing purposes. The name, was in fact something used for a "hoax" I created when I was, what, eleven years old. You know what I find odd, how this user is brand new, and this is the first thing he or she does on Wikipdia. Is the reporter not a sock puppet himself? ℥nding · start 23:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You continue something that you have been blocked for in the past. You create hoaxes. You spread false information. You throw evil information on living people and bring bad speech over those song writers and other people that you mention in your "articles". Remove all this false information and finaly stop doing what you did in the past and never do it again. Or remove yourself from the project. If you need a sandbox use true information or use information that is obvious fantasy, not a mixture. Also a sandbox is not a place for abuse or for insulting people by spreading false information about them. --U79.201.116.159 (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I've never indented to do any harm at all. I can easily remove all the information. I honestly couldn't care less. I never meant for any of it to be taken seriously. I'd like to know who you are. You're obviously an established user here on Wikipedia. Why are you hiding? ℥nding · start 23:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * This isn't the place to argue about any issues except socking --Guerillero &#124; My Talk   23:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * (Reply to the IP's above comment) Hoaxes? I have never known Ending-start to make hoaxes. If this ever occurred, it must have been long ago. If not, provide a link to a "hoax" edit he has recently made, whether under Zachsays or Ending-start. -- ĈÞЯİŒ  1ооо  23:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the user is referring to the sandboxes I made on Zachsays. I was under the impression that what I was doing was fine. I was not being disruptive to Wikipedia, and I WAS JUST DOING IT WAS TESTING PURPOSES, AND SOMETHINGS WHEN I WAS BORED. ℥nding · start 23:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If you are bored do something usefull. Not all of us see serious information as some kind of playground or big fun but have to deal with them as their livelihood. From my point of view the information was removed and the userpages redirected, I withdraw my request here. For the other question I think it does not matter who gave me instructions on how to find through this jungle of pages and what concerns to address. --U79.201.116.159 (talk) 23:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't appreciate your tone with me. I was not just doing that for "big fun". I did say SOMETIMES; most of the time I was just trying to improve my editing and writing technique for music related articles here on Wikipedia. Is that really a crime? ℥nding · start 23:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You can play around in your sand box as much as you want within reason. About the Sandbox. Also the sourceless article you linked to appear to be current drafts that are allowed under current wikipedia rules. --Guerillero &#124;  My Talk   00:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I have worked with this user under his previous name and his current editing name. Currently he is a fine young editor, who does not vandalise. He admits to having had alternative user names which is not an issue. The SPI is designed to investigate sock puppeting. Endingstart is not in breach of SP rules thus this investigation should be closed. If you wish to bring up the hoaxes again then do so at a more appropriate location. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  00:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I declined to block this account earlier today on AIV. Clearly, all of these accounts are socks, but the Ending-Start account was a productive user of about 10,000 edits.  I was very concerned that he seemed to be returning to his old ways and creating another series of fake articles (in userspace this time) that were the exact reason (and topic) for his previous blocks; these are not "draft articles".  I don't see any SPI actions needed here.  If he's done with his "test" we can delete the tests and move on with no other actions.  Kuru   (talk)  00:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm with Kuru on this. Closing for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)