Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zebrasil/Archive

25 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The first few make the same revert within a few days:


 * Zebrasil's revert
 * CJGMs revert
 * Timothy.dougrow's reverts
 * one of Mark.int's comments

All of these editors have suddenly appeared on the same day with an interest in the InternetQ article. Tim.thelion (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. I could block the non-stale registered users (Maja and Filoktimon are stale) based on duck, but it's not clear to me whether the others are socks or meat puppets. For example, Mark.int admits she works for InternetQ (initially, she said she was a "partner" (first edit) and subsequently/now said she works there ). Therefore, I'm endorsing a CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to . and  are ✅, and both are extremely  to be .  is .  --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed accounts were indeffed if they weren't already, including the master. Tagged all confirmed.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)