Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenny101/Archive

Evidence submitted by Seb az86556
Rapidly creating the same junk/vandal-pages. See deleted contributions. There might be more. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Possibly . Same pattern: unknown name + "is (adjective)"-statement. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

, no evidence to suggest that these are socks as opposed to the countless clueless users we encounter every hour, except for Aj60 and Hank glaros, who created the same article. Nonetheless, absent evidence of continuing disruption, a CU is unnecessary. Tim Song (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Maybe I jumped the gun. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 03:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

No action taken for now. Further disruption should be reported to WP:AIV. Tim Song (talk) 21:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)