Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zia86khan/Archive

Evidence submitted by OlYeller21
The similarities between the IP and Shumayel86 will show more than the edits on each of these pages. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 14:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Guy (Help!) 14:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive user evading blocks and repeatedly re-creating articles, not engaging in any form of discussion. Guy (Help!) 14:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I see enough similarities combined with non-interleaving edits between the accounts to warrant a checkuser. Auntie E. (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

✅



Apparently ❌

is also probably ❌, but I can't tell for sure. Closer to than anything.

I think the IP may be an open proxy. J.delanoy gabs adds 22:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well User:Ziauk86 did create User:Zia86khan... Anyway, are you saying that User:Shumayel86 is not related to User:Ihsanss86, and therefore the block should be revoked? ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 02:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, oops. is ✅ as Zia86khan et al. I forgot to list the account, sorry.  J.delanoy gabs adds  02:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Score. I see NW blocked all the others, so I've just given Ihsanss86 a month long block. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 03:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

20 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Clearly a sock. After making a check in the history of Aamir Khan, I noticed similar edits (of glorification). Now, I'm not sure if it's him, but I'm sure this account is a sock. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  11:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I agree with Shshshsh on this one - this account is clearly a sock, and I've blocked as such. I'm not sure it's Zia86, though; my personal guess is that it's . Either way, they're blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)