Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Kingkobra775 is already indeffed- just adding to investigation so they can be tagged (easily passes WP:DUCK). Only one edit from Stingman8855, but edit seems to be similar to the same exact 'rerun' edits as other accounts/IPs. 205.213.208.101 IP doing same exact rerun edits, so seems to pass DUCK easily as well- reverting on List of Fanboy & Chum Chum episodes immediately after another sock was blocked. Magitroopa (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Added another on, Supahotfire29912. Already blocked, but changing dates again on List of Fanboy & Chum Chum episodes. Page in question has also been protected as of their block. Magitroopa (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * To note, is also an account blocked as a sock. Blocked the unblocked one. Tagged all that are untagged. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 19:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Report initiated because Superman29912 admitted to having other accounts. Kingkobra775 is the oldest of the four.

All four users edited on cartoon pages. All four use similar writing styles with no capital letters except at the beginning of the sentence ( [). noticed the similarities last month. two accounts use "bro" and dude.

CU requested to check for sleepers given admission to having sock. please check if there are other sock masters given the admission of guilt.

 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Also found and ✅:
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Zjholder appears to be the oldest account. Please move case to that username.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Zjholder appears to be the oldest account. Please move case to that username.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * case moved to oldest, per request. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like there is nothing left to do. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same edits as past socks (compare  to  )

CU requested for confirmation and sleeper check  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

I will note there is another blocked account that look a bit similar ( Pieboy999 compared to Siah). is a bit similar too.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * .  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Given the user admitted to being blocked in the past and the "likely" I'm going to block., would using the sockpuppet with confirmed be okay with just a "likely"?  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * EvergreenFir - In this case, I'd reserve tagging someone as "a confirmed" sock if it's actually confirmed. It's very likely them, but not close enough for me to confirm it. :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I think what you were looking for is "proven", which basically means, "I'm totally sure, but there wasn't enough technical evidence for a CU to call it confirmed". I'm going to go ahead and archive this, but feel free to retag the sock if you want. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Theshavia29912 reported TheFallenPower for "vandalism" at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; it was not vandalism and the edit was made by another user, not TheFallenPower, but they seem to have assumed it was TheFallenPower based on edits in the past, and are continuing a dispute started by Kingkobra775, a sockpuppet of Zjholder. Also compare by Headband29912 with  by Theshavia29912 - the content is different, but they are saying the same thing, that the date should be 2006 - Theshavia29912 is currently blocked from editing that article. The username is also similar to others in the sockpuppet category (Killerboy29912, Supahotfire29912, Superman29912). Peter James (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The '29912' in the username alone should be a clear sign that this the same person. Full block definitely needed for them... Magitroopa (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * + HB29912, please check for sleepers ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * – given that this one has created sleepers in the past, a check seems warranted. Best, Blablubbs&#124;talk 13:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * - Mz7 (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Theshavia29912 is ✅ to Siahforrest from the archive. HB29912 is ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 02:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged both. Blablubbs&#124;talk 18:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

No on-Wikipedia edits thus far, but has been editing over on Wikimedia. Also worth noting that 'forrest' is in their name, just like past socks Siahforrest and Mjforrest. Also edited the talk page of TheFallenPower on Wikimedia, whom previous socks (including recent Theshavia29912) has been against (such as here). Magitroopa (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Account has now been globally locked. Going to keep this report for reference though... Magitroopa (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No edits, no filter log entries, account globally locked... Closing ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same 'forrest' and '29912' stuff in usernames as previous socks, as well as the HBS one being almost identical to recent sock HB29912. WP:DUCK, very clearly socks.. The awsome forrest 29912 also appeared on my Wiktionary talk page, so hoping that could get globally locked as well. Magitroopa (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Sigh* three new socks over on Commons, Caidin-Johnsohn29912forrest, CaidinJohnsohn, and Caidddin Johhnson. Magitroopa (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clear DUCK.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 16:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * and . Blablubbs&#124;talk 17:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I've noticed that a lot of Zjholder's socks have the name "forrest" in it. This user changed the dates on List of Dragon Tales episodes without citing sources. This is the evidence: Zachary Daiquiri (talk) 17:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Also, he self admitted that he was a sock of Zjholder on his user page. Zachary Daiquiri (talk) 17:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to and . Bagging and tagging sock account. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   17:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seemingly edit warring once more at List of Rugrats episodes, same exact edits as recent sock User:Mjforrest 67136713. Account already blocked as a vandalism-only account, but tagging needed (as this is likely a WP:DUCK case...) Magitroopa (talk) 01:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I wonder if they will ever give up. Because at this rate, this could lead to an LTA report.  Zachary Daiquiri  Talk? 12:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just came upon Sockpuppet investigations/Caidin-Johnson and I'm thinking this might be a bigger SPI/LTA than thought... seems like these two SPIs may be related, as I recently came upon a few 'Caidin Johnsohn'-related names over on Wikimedia Commons (see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents). Surely those would have to tie in to that SPI, meaning Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder (this) and Sockpuppet investigations/Caidin-Johnson may all be the same person. Magitroopa (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * And if it is all the same person, then there is already an LTA ongoing at Long-term abuse/Caidin-Johnson. Magitroopa (talk) 02:15, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * With Caidin-Johnson related accounts likely including that name and Zjholder socks including 'forrest' and/or '29912', I would think Caidin-Johnsohn29912forrest on Commons may be the account that ties everything up all together. Magitroopa (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Because Zjholder could be a possible sockpuppet of User:Caidin-Johnson, do you think this SPI should be merged?  Zachary Daiquiri   Talk? 11:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indeffed as VOA and Tony checked some other socks very recently. Closing. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 21:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Addition of trivial/unsourced rerun information on Tak and the Power of Juju (TV series) and Back at the Barnyard, similar to previous socks such as Kingkobra775, Packman2445, and Killerboy29912. Username also contains numbering '6713', similar to past sock Mjforrest 67136713.

Sleeper check may be best as well, considering all of the recent socks across Wikimedia sites. Magitroopa (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Locked. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 04:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Yet another sock vandalizing/going after users including myself & TheFallenPower on Wikimedia Commons. Magitroopa (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This account doesn't exist on enwiki. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 04:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same username pattern. Already blocked on simple.wikipedia following vandalism/harassment against me once more. Magitroopa (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * 29912mjforrestzjholder now popped-up on Wikimedia Commons. This just isn't ever going to end... Magitroopa (talk) 19:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Could a global lock also be applied to this account and past socks as well? They are continuing to harass me across all the Wiki-related sites. Magitroopa (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Zjhollder now as well. Magitroopa (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Just based on username similarity (Zj javier, etc), I'm wondering if this is related to Sockpuppet investigations/Zigmund jhaey javier? Either that, or somebody's playing for a high scrabble score. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd love to try and WP:DENY, but is there anything 'better' do to than just report here & ignore or is that the best option?... Was in the process of creating an ANI thread to ask given the 5 accounts from today alone. I asked for possible talk page protection over on simple.wikipedia, but was told, "We usually don't protect talk page, however if it gets really worse we can do a short term protection as needed." I've now removed email notification for edits to my talk page on all sites excluding here. Magitroopa (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

What can be done at this point has been done. Let me know if they decide to come back. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 02:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Zjhoolder29912 is already globally locked, and 29912mjforrestzjholder is not registered on enwiki. I've semi-protected User talk:Magitroopa for a month to prevent the immediate abuse.  I'm not sure what else I can do.   is there anything that can be done at the steward level to protect User talk:Magitroopa across all wikis? -- RoySmith (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * - Because of the targeted personal abuse, requesting CU to see if there's anything that can be done at an IP level. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing per above. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * per below. Ponyo bons mots 23:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Self-admitted sock. I thought it might be a joe job throwing a wrench in any possible standard offer, but the geolcation is an exact match to the CU logs for . Blocked, tagged, and .-- Ponyo bons mots 23:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Check his edits Notrealname1234 (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)