Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/maleabroad/Archive

Report date September 28 2009, 16:34 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Bksimonb

Obvious retaliation account immediately after was blocked.


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked/tagged indefinitely. NW ( Talk )`

Report date September 27 2009, 14:05 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Bksimonb

Another account in a recent succession created (see archive of Lucy socks) that shows an immediate familiarity with the BKWSU article and behaviour of an experienced editor.

The choice of username is similar to others chosen by Lucy in the sense that it consists of a short phrase e.g. "Documentingabuse", "Down-on-the-Everette-Plantation", "Sweetnessandlight", "Emperor of the Golden Age", "One of the Eight" etc. The choice of username isn't provocative this time, probably because his previous attempt, "If your mother dies, eat halva", got blocked immediately for username policy violation.

This account has made one edit to the BKWSU article which contains one portion that is contentious in that what appears to be a website for a BKWSU splinter group, who call themselves the Advance Party, http://www.advance-party.com/introduction.htm, is used for a reference. In fact, the domain name doesn't resolve to anything. Apart from that, if it did exist then such a website would be a very unreliable source of information about BK beliefs as it would be self-published opinion. This is immediately followed by a completely unreferenced statement about the "Vishnu Party".

Nearest of Shiv Baba, is Lord Krishna, followed by Goddess Laxmi. The superior beings wanted to 'explore' the physical world; Krishna and Laxmi went first, followed by other superior beings. The BKs believe that as Shiv Baba destroys the world through the Shankara avatar, through his Vishnu form He sustains it. There is also a BK faction named the "Vishnu Party" devoted to Vishnu.

It is the juxtaposition of seemingly constructive editing along with outright questionable statements with unreliable sources that indicates to me that this is Lucy. An editor experienced enough to know what good sources are would unlikely also use silly sources except to be disruptive.

Although this account hasn't done anything really outrageous yet, I am fairly convinced this is Lucy out to prove a point again.

Bksimonb (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * NW ( Talk ) 20:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ❌ to the latest socks. However, they are ✅ to be the same user than and, who are tagged as socks of . --  Luk  talk 14:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

OK I stand corrected. It's Malabroad not Lucy. Thanks Bksimonb (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions


 * Tagged and blocked. NW ( Talk ) 16:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)