Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/2006/August/23

Doctorwho-stub &rarr; DoctorWho-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move

Given that Who is a proper noun in this case, and also part of the capitalised title of a television programme, this should properly be at DoctorWho-stub. A shift to the new name is simple enough, but I've brought it here in case there is enough support for getting rid of the former name, which I would weakly support myself. Grutness...wha?  07:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Move (probably speedily), keep redirect (at any desired speed), make Tardis smaller (though of course, only on the outside). Alai 14:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support as per Alai. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  15:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved; if you still wish rid of the redirect, please tag that.  Alai 17:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah - I'm easy either way about that. Since the comments above seem to veer towards keep, I'll accept that. Grutness...wha?  09:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Redirects of cvg-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was one deleted, one kept, one not nominated

For some reason, cvg-stub seems to have three redirects, two of which are unused. While Videogame-stub may be worth saving, I don't see the point in also having two unused redirects, CVG-stub and the frankly misleading Video-stub. Both of these should probably go. Grutness...wha?  01:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support deletion of video-stub. Ambivalent on deletion on CVG-stub, but tending towards delete seeing as it is unused and therefore a loose end. --TheParanoidOne 05:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Transplutonicly strong delete of video-stub, apathetic keep of the other two. We'e far from consistent on capitalisation of abbreviations, and I see no harm in covering bases on reasonable variations where there's scope for relatively well-informed confusion.  BTW, I assume you're in fact only nominating the two you've tagged, G.  Alai 06:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Videogame-stub makes a certain amount of sense and seems to be in use. Since the other two aren't in use, it shouldn't make much odds to get rid of them. Grutness...wha?  07:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete video-stub. Not decided about CVG-stub; while it may catch incorrect caps, it isn't really used, and being lenient about caps just causes confusion down the line where they aren't redirected. Crystallina 16:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If we had a clear convention on caps in general, redirecting from other capitalisations might indeed be somewhat "lenient". But we don't;  what we in fact have is wholesale inconsistency.  Until that's changed (plus some reasonable grace period) I don't think we should treating these the way we do, say, templates with spaces instead of hyphens).  Alai 19:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.