Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/December/12

Internet-term-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

From WP:WSS/D. No category. Not used on any articles. Probably speediable. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  19:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Alai 19:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Belfast

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge

From WP:WSS/D. Associated with WikiProject Belfast. Too small, even if associated with a WP. There were also concerns on /D that this wouldn't be the right way to split. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  19:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Belfast-stub / 7 articles
 * Belfast-geo-stub / 7 articles
 * Is this somewhat populable? If so, double-upmerge the the -geo-, otherwise, upmerge both.  Alai 19:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Carnatic music-stub → Carnatic-music-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy rename

From WP:WSS/D. It's large enough and makes sense enough to list on WP:STUBS, but the template needs a rename first. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * From the person who brought us Classical Tamil-stub, judging by his brag^Wadmission-sheet. Maybe someone should mention the NGs to him.  Speedily renamed, no objection to listing.  Alai 18:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

McDonalds-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

From WP:WSS/D. 22 articles. Not really sure this is a good split. ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  18:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, as a side note, the template creator (User:Irish the Great) is blocked as a sockpuppet of User:MascotGuy, who is considered a long-term vandal. <b style="color:maroon;">~ Amalas</b> rawr  <sup style="color:navy;">=^_^=  18:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Not outrageous, but scope is such that it will (or ought) always to be doubled-stubbed.  (I guess that's one type we don't have to worry about the "free keep from creator, regardless of guidelines".)  Alai 18:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

pageant-bio-stub /
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background: #ebfefa; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep

From WP:WSS/D. It's pretty close to 60 articles, though. A pageant-stub was proposed in April, but not created. This might be useful to weed out though. <b style="color:maroon;">~ Amalas</b> rawr  <sup style="color:navy;">=^_^=  17:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This was proposed at WP:WSS/P on May 26 and only received one comment, which was by Alai supporting it.--Carabinieri 18:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah-ha! I found the proposal.  It didn't show up on the Archive summary page when I search for "pageant".  Sorry about that...  Consider this withdrawn, but I'm going to leave the discussion templates (sfd-t, etc) up anyway, unless someone else feels otherwise.  <b style="color:maroon;">~ Amalas</b>  rawr  <sup style="color:navy;">=^_^=  18:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Seems OK, as long as it doesn't end up applied to every actress and model who was once in a BP.  If kept, clarify scoping statement to make clear it's for people who are primarily notable for this.  Alai 18:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP This is a brilliant idea for all the stubs that have previously been tagged as "model" etc because there was no alternative... there are many, many articles that could be tagged with this but we just haven't got around to to it. Definitely needs to be kept. --  PageantUpdater  •  talk  |  contribs  |  esperanza  20:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.