Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/December/3

American-bio-stub (redirect)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

A redirect of US-bio-stub that doesn't follow the naming guidelines. Other than that I have no real objection to it. By itself it is harmless enough, but the problems it could cause for confusion as to whether the vast number of US-*-stub 's have American-*-stub counterparts, leads me to suggest deletion. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unnecessary and ambiguous, since "American" has a double meaning. Grutness...wha?  22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not in heavy use, will save users confusion (and indeed typing) in the long run.  Alai 06:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirects can do more harm than good. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 19:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

MNTV-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Brought straight here for deletion without waiting for the discoveries page, as it's in the same vein as the other U.S. commercial television network stubs deleted back in October. Only 5 stubs, all station affiliates, 4 of them low power stations. Caerwine Caer’s whines 20:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I thought I got all of them in October.  Guess not.  ~ Amalas  rawr  =^_^=  23:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.