Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/November/7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

More work from User:Robertjohnsonrj: no template and surprisingly enough no contents (other than a category, which wasn't a stub category and has now been moved to somewhere more appropriate). Never proposed. Speediable in a couple of days if it remains empty, but I'm going through the formal process here just in case. Delete. Grutness...wha?  21:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Wait before deletion - If you say this user has been very active in the last 24 hours, then maybe he has plans for this category. By all means, if no work or linking to has occurred in a few days, then speedy it. Spawn Man 02:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. (He's been active in creating categories, seemingly on the basis of spurious redlinks -- someone should really rename "Wanted categories" -- not contents for same.)  Alai 04:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Also religion is one item that it's not really logical to split by country - splitting it by religion is much more sensible, and that is how other reli-stub subcats are split. Grutness...wha?  05:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Agree with Alai that "Wanted categories" should be renamed. It would also be a great idea to add a little notice saying that in some cases these categories have been deliberately deleted. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 14:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. MER-C 08:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)'''

Recently renamed to and recreated (I hope in good faith) by User:Robertjohnsonrj, who has been VERY busy the last 24 hours. Pegship 12:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I've speedied it as a re-creation. He has been busy, hasn't he... There are a couple more possible SFD's in there (see above). Grutness...wha?  21:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

&rarr;

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Not for stubs for little green multitentacled extraterrestrials, but for stubs relating to the planet Mars. Main category is, and - depite the logical reasons for suggesting using an adjectival form for countries on earth - the noun form is probably preferable here. Grutness...wha?  09:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Move as per nom - Would make it easier to find etc... Spawn Man 02:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom, and naming guidelines. (BTW, I see no difference in interplanetary treatment here:  "Martian crater stubs" and "France stubs" would both be logical and conventional, but this, and likewise "French stubs", would not be.)  Alai 04:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Good point - I hadn't considered that. Grutness...wha?  05:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename per above. MER-C 10:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * SUPPORT--aceslead 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.