Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/November/9


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. MER-C 05:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)'''

Speedy delete; another re-creation from the earnest perusers of Special:Wantedcategories. *sigh* Pegship 00:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedied, for the second time in three days. Talking of days, it's now the 11th. :)  Alai 00:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

→

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy rename

Speedy rename; correct case. Not WPSS-approved, but quite decently populated and no comment made on the Discoveries page. The template is fine: Finland-artist-stub. Pegship 17:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Renamed, will speedy the old cat once the job queue catches up. It's a bit small, so I'm not sure it's a dead cert at /D.  Alai 23:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Delete. Film stubs are sorted by country or genre, not language; we have an India-film-stub; and the syntax is incorrect anyway. The template (Indian Punjabi-language films-stub) doesn't exist, so no action necessary there. Pegship 17:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Victorian-rail-stub → Victoria-rail-stub / →

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Template doesn't follow the naming guidelines; category is distinctly confusing. Alai 09:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * hows that confusing? --Dan027 11:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Support move The confusion arises because some editors (like myself) see "Victorian" and their first thought is Victorian era. Slambo (Speak)  11:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * thats why it says "This category is for stub articles relating to Rail transport in Victoria. You can help Wikipedia by expanding them." im not stiring anyone up here, but i just dont like the sound of "Victoria-rail-stub", sounds like broken english. --Dan027 11:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Have you checked the Stub naming guidelines? Or similar stub types like Victoria-geo-stub (Cat:Victoria geography stubs)? Rename per nom. Grutness...wha?  22:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 00:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Rename per nom. --CComMack (t–c) 03:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename - per nom. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

A #-style redirect, no entries, linked from one talk page. Alai 08:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seriously, I've never seen any stub that is a redirect before -- ¿Exir? ¡Kamalabadi!  06:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * My first time too. :) Alai 06:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't redirects like that fall under the criteria for speedy deletion? --Ohms law 17:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Strange.. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

→ ; →

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

As below, but emphasis on the "noun phrase" part this time. Alai 04:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * above u are asking for a change of plural to singular, and here your asking for the opposite, why? --Dan027 11:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * He's doing no such thing. Hhe's arguing for a change from the adjectival form to the noun form, as stated in the stub naming guidelines. "Winter Olympics" is not a plural - or can you point out to me exactly what a "Winter Olympic" is? Grutness...wha?  22:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * PS - that's a rename, BTW. Grutness...wha?  22:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * go take your stress out on someone else mate, i was asking Alai the question not Grutness.
 * Perhaps you should post your question to Alai on Alai's talk page, then. Pegship 17:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Rename per nom. --Ohms law 17:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename - per nom. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

→

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Per the 'singular noun phrase' doctrine. Alai 04:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Pegship 04:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. --Ohms law 17:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * FYI: I cahnged the template on the current page to sfr. --Ohms law 17:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Rename - per nom. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.