Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/October/17

→

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

My bad, I misnamed it when I created it. Please speedy. Her Pegship 04:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Followup from WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries. Template is OK, but rename category to conform with other "building and structure" categories. Her Pegship 20:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename, and I think we could probably speedy this, given the clear consent to the general pattern. Alai 02:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sahaja-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

(followup from WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries). This stub was created without permission on October 11, 2006, and is currently being used on three articles. There has evidently been a recent campaign to introduce multiple vanity articles on Wikipedia which are related to this religion (some call it a cult) of Sahaja Yoga, and this stub appears to be part of that. I recommend deletion. See also Articles for deletion/Sahaja Yoga International --NovaSTL 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  20:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, too narrow. Alai 02:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not bothered either way on this stub. I do however take exception to the use of the term "multiple vanity articles" The articles in question are factual. One person's genuine attempt to increase the factual content of the Wikipedia database should be commended not smeared as a 'recent campaign' Sahajhist 13:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - My bad, definitely too narrow for the moment. Wasn't intended as vanity, just coordination. The recent campaign concerns one article... Sfacets 11:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete narrow, underpopulated category. Wryspy 09:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.