Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/October/20

Hong Kong-road-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Spacey redirect. This type was a distinct mess: one template and two redirects, none of them complying to standard and NG names. I've moved the template to HongKong-road-stub, which is, leaving redirects from Hong-Kong-road-stub and HK-road-stub, which are less egregious, though hardly desirable as such. Alai 19:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this redirect and the Hong-Kong one, HK seems okay as a redirect, though, so I don't mind whether it's kept or not. Any indication of how frequently it's used? Grutness...wha?  23:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Often -- unsurprisingly, in that IN keeps creating them, keeps using them, and maintains (contra HK and google) that the term is a veritable model of unambiguity). In fact it's a pretty sure bet that all usages are at one of the redirects or another, since I moved the template a little while ago, from Hong-Kong-road-stub.  Alai 01:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep the HK ones. IMO, the templates should in fact be named HK rather than HongKong, cf UK. I've no opinion regarding the spacey and hyphenated ones. &mdash; Instantnood 23:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vedanta-stub / Category:Vedanta stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Empty, not used. Should be deleted. GizzaChat  &#169; 00:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Populate or delete. As it stands at present it's probably speediable (empty, never seems to have been used), but is in need of splitting. I don't know enough about the subject to know whether this is a viable way of doing that or not, though. On that subject, and after a quick look at the Hinduism stubs category, I suspect a Hindu temple stub would be very useful. Grutness...wha?  00:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete empty, unused category. Wryspy 09:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Berbers-stub/ and Berber-stub/

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete plural versions, upmerge berber-stub

Never proposed, these only 18 and five stubs respectively, despite being created two months ago, and have a curious mix of ethno-group stubs, hist-stubs, party-stubs and geo-stubs. One of the template/category pairs has unnecessary plural names, too. We certainly don't need both, and it's questionable whether we need either. Not needed in its present form - first option Delete both pairs, distant second option sort properly and populate the singularly named one, and delete the other one. Grutness...wha?  00:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * As the creator of Berber-stub/ i suggest deleting Berbers-stub/ after transferring all its content to Berber-stub/.
 * P.S. I haven't paid attention to the existence of Berbers-stub/. -- Szvest 10:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up ®
 * Or to the stub proposal process, size guidelines, etc... Delete the plural pair, at a minumum.  I'd suggest upmerging the other, but it's not clear to me what the upmerger target would be.  Africa-stub isn't quite right, ethno-group-stub, possiblie.  Alai 04:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Those templates would make it eazier to bring the berber related stubs together. I would vote for Berber-stub. Because wikipedia tends to use the singular names.Read3r 13:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Update: Upmerged to  ~ Amalas  rawr  =^_^=  15:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.