Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/October/28

Category:Craters on Mars stubs and MarsCrater-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Was never proposed. Underpopulated (39 members). Unnecessary stub type, there was no problem with the previous mars-stub and crater-stub combination. Does this also mean we need a stub type for each mountain or rock on Mars? MER-C 09:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mars-stub is hardly overburdened, either, so there shouldn't be any problems if the stubs are in there. Grutness...wha?  21:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We can always make something clever later should this material show significant growth. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 23:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Upmerge (presumably "doubly"), and rename to Mars-crater-stub, which would be per convention. This is not ridiculously narrow.  Category name isn't the best, but it seems unnecessary to discard tagging effort.  Alai 02:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with the nom. If there was more members then I'd say keep, but it does seem to be an unnecessary stub template. Spawn Man 01:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.