Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/September/21

Struct-stub and all its child-struct-stubs → Structure-stub &c.

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus (and no tagging)

Summarily rename to make WP less cryptic. I have a friendly bot (Alphachimpbot) who will do the job, I am sure. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Summarily? No strong opinion on template moves, but oppose deletion of struct-stub if turned into a redirect (and hence any unnecessary mass bot-edits).  Alai 15:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, or like that, w/o the bot, and a full complement of redirects. Summarily here was meant not as "without discussion" but as "rename the whole shebang" - CrazyRussian talk/email 16:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose Though I wouldn't be opposed to adding building-stub & structure-stub as redirects. Caerwine Caer’s whines  02:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * May we ask why? - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You may ask, but I'll spare you the need to do so.  Whether it be struct, structure, or building, these are all abbreviations for the category  and struct has the advantages of already existing for quite some time and being shorter, hence the opposition.  It is slightly cryptic, which is why that opposition is weak. Caerwine Caer’s whines  07:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No real opinion on whether the templates should be moved, but if they are, the struct- names should at least be kept as redirects, for the same reasons that Alai is against the deletion of mid-hierarchy categories - they've been in use for a long time, and any removal of them is going to create a major "huh?" factor. Grutness...wha?  04:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.