Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/April/15

Bus-section-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to bus-sectexpand


 * Category:Bus articles with sections needing expansion
 * Template:Bus-section-stub

The idea of topic-specific section stubs makes my head hurt. In theory "sect-stub" should only be used when the article itself is not a stub. As far as I know this is the only template of this type. — CharlotteWebb 01:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have seen one other like it (for anime, IIRC), though I'm not a fan of them either. I'm not entirely clear whether it comes through here or just TFD, since sectstubs aren't stubs (which is why they aren't dealt with by WP:WSS - a separate WikiProject for sectstub was suggested at WP:WSS at one point, and the shuddering registered 3.7 on the Richter scale). If kept, it should be moved bus-sectstub to make it clear that it is a sectstub for buses, not a stub for bus sections. Grutness...wha?  01:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ideally we'd get rid of the component "stub" from the names of these templates, as we previously did with the corresponding category. Say, to sectexpand (and bus-sectexpand if topical version seem like a good idea (which to me, they don't)).  But it's not clear to me whether we'd do that here, at TFD (do they handle renamings?), or just by making the move and seeing who yelps.  Alai 16:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I say we should move it to bus-sectexpand and reword it. I created it as a way for history section of articles on bus routes to be expanded anyway.--sonicKAI 23:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rename US-women-hoops-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy rename

The category is and all the entries in it appear to be biographies, but the template is missing the -bio- part (cf. hoops-bio-stub and US-hoops-bio-stub). Rename to US-women-hoops-bio-stub for consistency. Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My bad, fixed. Alai 07:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.