Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/April/2

Kamen-rider-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to KamenRider-stub

Unproposed, only four stubs. Might be useful, but if so the template is in strong need of renaming. This isn't a type of rider stub - we don't have a rider stub for it to be a type of. Also, there's no such thing as Kamen rider - it's Kamen Rider, with a capital R, so it would need to be at KamenRider-stub if kept. Either rename, if it can be shown to be useful, or delete. Grutness...wha?  06:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll rename it. Simple as that. I'm still in the process of populating it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, I don't see why I need to go through the web of red tape and propose this stub, when I had the need for it now.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If you'd proposed it, the mistake in the name would have been pointed out before it was made, saving both you and us work. QED. Grutness...wha?  06:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The name's fixed now. It's now at Kamen-Rider-stub while I use kamen-rider-stub as a redirect.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE stop confusing the issue! Okay - I now change the initial nomination, since you've moved the template from one incorrect name to another incorrect name: Next time, wait before adding further confusion. Moving the template from one incorrect name to another incorrect name just creates even more work! Grutness...wha?  06:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the Kamen-rider-stub redirect
 * Either rename or delete Kamen-Rider-stub - it should, as pointed out be at KamenRider-stub - and the category, keeping only if they can be shown to reach threshold.
 * Fine— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's now at KamenRider-stub— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 07:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Do something. Kamen Rider is way too specific.  How about toku-stub? hbdragon88 07:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I had a need for this one earlier today in creating around 3 or so stub articles for Kamen Riders. Out of the handful of other articles in Category:Tokusatsu, I don't think many are stubs. And if they are, they're covered by japan-tv-stub— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 07:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Upmerge That same argument could be used for Kamen Rider stub articles. The few that Wikipedia has are adequately covered by Japan-tv-stub  (Wikipedia's otaku generally do a good job of making articles on such subjects more than stubs.)  I could possibly see a use for a tokusatsu-stub but not such an overly specific one. Caerwine Caer’s whines  01:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I really don't care anymore. Stub proposal has got to be one of the more asinine processes I've ever had to deal with on Wikipedia.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 02:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * But you've never dealt with the stub proposal process! Which is, pof course, the trouble, and the reason for the current mess - everything would have been sorted out correctly the first time if this had been proposed. We wouldn't have you naming, renaming, deleting, and generally messing around with templates while a deletion process was in progress. Anything which seems asinine about the current mess could very well have been avoided if things had been debated properly in the first place. Grutness...wha?  02:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Central Asia-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Unproposed, incorrectly named, and redundant duplicate of long-extant CAsia-stub. Delete. Grutness...wha?  06:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedied with creator's approval. Grutness...wha?  07:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.