Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/April/28

NRHP

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Merge with NRHP-stub. Only about 25 article use NRHP. About 5 times as many use NRHP-stub. It is not apparent that this template is even populating a category. Also, unsure about fair use of NHRP image. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 21:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Restub and delete Regardless of the fair use status of the icon in NRHP, it isn't useful and doesn't appear to have any official status. Caerwine Caer’s whines  07:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Faroe Islands-bio-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename and upmerge

Unproposed and misnamed. I've no objection to a bio-stub for the Faroe Islands, but convention suggests that Faroes-bio-stub would be the correct name - and given the size of (under 100 stubs), upmerging might be the best option. Rename and upmerge. Grutness...wha?  00:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The name is the only problem? Go ahead and change it, as long, as people of this nationalitiy get their own bio-stubs -- Arne List 12:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename to Faroes-bio-stub and upmerge to the generic category until this material shows more growth. Valentinian T / C 15:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.