Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/April/4

Entourage-Stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Tackling a few from the top of WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_type_sizes today... this one is unproposed, badly named (both the template with its capital S and the category which should be at . Unused, and even if every articles in were a stub it still wouldn't get within 15 of threshold. Entirely unnecessary. Delete. Grutness...wha?  23:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

ISTR this one got modified after discovery or here at SFD... either way, this is emoty and is not connected by a template. As such, it's possibly speediable. Grutness...wha?  23:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete ASAP. Valentinian T / C 18:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Future-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed and curiously named. According to the template it's for articles relating to the future, not for future articles (all viable stubs should be future articles in the long run). Unused, too. Theoretically, a rescoped/renamed stub type might be useful for articles on future years, but as it currently stands it crosses the hirarchy quite badly ( has subcategories for buildings, events, products, vehicles...) so deletion might be a better option. Grutness...wha?  23:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

IT-swimming-bio-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete cat, rename/upmerge template

ISTR this one cropped up at WSS/D a while back. Unused, unproposed, uses the digraph rather than full name for Italy. Currently there aren't enough stubs on Italian swimmers for this to reach threshold, though a renamed named Italy-swimming-bio-stub might well be useful. So that's delete the category, rename and upmerge the template. Grutness...wha?  23:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.