Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/December/19

→, feline-stub → felidae-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was creating felidae-stub as a redirect, category change rejected since the CfD for the permanent category was closed as no consensus

Please discuss this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cats. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, no. Please discuss it here. Or at the very least, bring a consensus of what the Cat WikiProject wants done here. Stub renaming is done here, so it makes little sense to conduct the discussion elsewhere. Grutness...wha?  07:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's important that the discussion takes place at only one location. Previously, I requested cat-stub and its category to be renamed felidae-stub, and instead it became feline-stub; and when I requested that Felidae be moved to felines - that request failed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's important that the discussion takes place at the most appropriate location. You should start at CFR, since the only reason the stub cat is where it is, is due to the permcat name.  Alai (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Here's the previous discussion regarding the stub category, fwiw. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 14:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * We have quite a number of latinate clade names for stubs, so no objection to creating Felidae-stub as a redirect from an alternate name, but with categories, we try to match the permanent category, which in this case is, so I can see renaming the category if and only if that category were renamed via a CfD. By the way, the customary notices hadn't been placed on teh stub category and template, but are on them now. Caerwine Caer’s whines  19:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No real contest against it, but it just seems a bit picky to me.  Oc t  ane  [ improve me ] 05.01.08 1709 (UTC)
 * Keep - this new proposed name is confusing, keep the old name. Chessy999 (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.