Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/February/12

February 12

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Rename to  (cat for )
This naming doesn't match the naming for the stub template and is out of sync with the naming for the other "novel" stub category namings. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  13:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 01:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, to conform to permcat, though noting this is (at least theoretically) a rescope, too. Alai 02:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rename medsign-stub → med-sign-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

This is an old stub stype that goes back to the days when everything fpr stub sorting was done on WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria. Doesn't fit the naming guidelines developed since then. Rename to match the NG's as it is a subtype of med-stub. Caerwine Caer’s whines 05:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename. Alai 02:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.