Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/February/20

Beatles-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed either at WP:WSS or at WP:WBeatles - and indeed discussion of such a stub type in the early days of the Beatles WikiProject was against having such a stub type. Only had one article, which was a fict-char-stub 9and only a borderline stub at that). Category scope is...odd... to say the least, and the name is just plain wrong (it's also unparented). Not needed, either, since there is a WP talk page template which covers this far more effectively. Delete. Grutness...wha?  01:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Finding 60 stub articles about the Beatles that do not relate to songs would be a rather tall order. Valentinian T / C 01:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.