Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/January/13

cosmology-stub and

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Category page does not have the propert setup -holds only 4 stubs. Goldenrowley 18:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this is probably populable from and, but if that's the intent, then it should be scoped more explicitly as such (since re-sorting astro-stubs into a type also scoped to include  would be a bad plan).  So rescope, and then either upmerge to astronomy, or populate, and rename category to .  Alai 22:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and recategorize each of the 4 articles. In my opinion too much overlap with other stubs that already exist? Goldenrowley 22:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Malay-stub (and its redirect Malays-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Never proposed, four stubs. Dreadfully named - feeds the nonexistent ! Unclear whether it's for the race, the language, the peninsula... all of which are covered adequately by other stub types. Delete Grutness...wha?  00:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A nice, uncomplicated delete. Alai 01:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Other stub types cover it, and the category doesn't exist.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   11:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 16:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fishkeeping-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep

Never proposed - only 19 stubs, but has a wikiproject. Doesn't look a likely stub type at present. >\ Grutness...wha?  00:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Withdrawing nom due to growth in category. But please propose creation next time! Grutness...wha?  04:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems a sane scope, is appropriately used (i.e. not on the actual fish), and it's about 60% of the way to viability. Nor does there seem to be a good upmerger target (shoving them in  doesn't seem like a good plan.  I'd be inclined to cut them some slack and hope they populate.  Alai 01:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This stub is created by WikiProject Aquarium Fishes after several members agreed it was needed. I apologize that it was not officially proposed here, but we did proposed it to the Aquarium Fishes wikiproject members and had our discussion here. Like Alai said, this stub is useful for the wikiproject members and is not mergeable with the fish stub (or any of its sub-stubs). We are just beginning to organize the fishkeeping articles, so in the near future you will see many more articles marked with the fishkeeping stubs. So, I'd like to ask for some time before you decide whether to delete or keep the stubs. --Melanochromis 03:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * As one of the members of the aforementioned WikiProject, I too move that the fishkeeping stub be kept. The WikiProject is currently in its infancy, but hopefully it will grow. I'd have devoted more time to it myself over the past couple of weeks if offline life hadn't intervened with bureaucratic woes (sigh). Calilasseia 11:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 33 stubs now, so seems fair enough. Alai 22:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.