Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/June/24

Pseudoscience-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, created (according to edit summary) for the one article found - hardly an indication of enough articles to warrant this stub type, especially since, though it is an unlikely theory, classifying this article as pseudoscience violates NPOV. Unnecessary - delete. Grutness...wha?  01:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I replaced the stub template on the one article that was using it. It's not needed anymore. Yechiel Man  22:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

European Union-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Unproposed, naming-guideline-violating duplicate of long standing EU-stub. Totally unnecessary - delete. Grutness...wha?  01:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree, just duplicates the EU-stub. - '' J Logan

t/c'': 06:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created this stub as part of a proposal of a new project page for WikiProject European Union, because I could not find an existing stub. Because there exists a stub, proposing another to the members of the project was not necessary and the creation therefore a mistake. Please delete.Thw1309 07:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - please in future note that new stub types are proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, not at the specific WikiProject connected with the stub type. Grutness...wha?  04:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per the above. Duplicate so not needed and the name doesn't follow the naming convention. Valentinian T / C 18:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Web games-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, malformed template (with no category link), again violating naming guidelines. And not needed, since web games are adequately covered byother stub types. No articles use this template - delete. Grutness...wha?  01:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete As nominator --Bsay USD  [Talk] [contribs]  21:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.