Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/March/23

Frasier-episode-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, and only two or three stubs. There were apparently some 260 episodes in total, but only a very small proportion have articles - certainly nowhere near the threshold number. We don't even have a Frasier-stub, so this is definite overkill. Delete. Grutness...wha?  07:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I created this stub and it is unproposed.(Sorry, didn't know about stub proposals till now) Right now about 50-55 episodes which have articles are stubs, I just didn't add them to this. Yeah, I think Grutness is right, that a Frasier stub is needed rather than a Frasier episode stub. -- Agεθ020 ( ΔT  •  ФC ) 17:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply - I'd be happy to see this changed (or even upmerged) into a Frasier-stub covering not just the episodes, but characters and the like - especially if there are as many articles as you suggest. Sounds like a reasonable compromise. Grutness...wha?  00:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I just checked the episode list now, and well over 60% of episodes have red links on them, and the rest mostly full length articles. I think a Frasier stub should be made when there are sufficient articles-- Agεθ020 ( ΔT  •  ФC ) 01:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK - when it gets to that size, propose one at WP:WSS/P... sounds like it's likely to at some point, but until then a stub type's probably not worthwhile. Grutness...wha?  12:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.