Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/March/7

art-history-stub → art-hist-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move, keep redirect

Rename for consistency with with other history stubs which use -hist-; no problem with keeping the existing template as a redirect or if anyone is feeling ambitious, going the other way and doing a mass SFD nom to make -history- the standard instead of the abbreviation. However, absent such a mass nomination, rename. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong 'move', weak 'keep redirect'. Alai 02:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support of rename. Goldenrowley 02:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

→

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Template name is OK, by hierarchy convention, but this doesn't make much sense at this category name. Perm-parent is. Alai 03:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.