Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/May/21

Carpenters-song-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed - with the one exception of the Beatles (which has a very active WikiProject) there are no separate stub categories for songs by artist, partly because songs are often known recorded by multiple artists, and partly because a split by decate is more useful to editors. This particular category (which has no parents, stub or otherwise) has very few articles (six), and several those which it has are not stubs. The logical parent permcat has only 39 articles, so this will not currently meet the stub-sorting threshold of 60. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think they were a major enough band to have a stub type. Karen Carpenter&#39;s Biggest Fan 19:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read my reasons for nomination. Big though they may have been, they are not second only to the Beatles in terms of music or influence (were they as big as Elvis Presley?), and certainly do not have the WikiProject support that the Beatles articles do. Also it is impossible for a category with 39 articles to have 60 current stubs, and as such this stub type does not reach the necessary levels for a separate stub type. Grutness...wha?  00:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Grutness. Not notable enough for their own stub.  G1  gg  y  !  04:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The band itself is notable, as Cuyler91093 claimed, but, as Grutness presented, is not at the level to deserve their own stub template.  hmwith  talk   06:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nyeusigrube-stub (redlinked cat)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed stub category for a fantasy world location that is itself a stub. The entirety of and its two subcategories is 16 articles - chances of there beig 60 current stubs, as per stub thresholds, is therefore nil. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per parent article, which is a stub, and which in itself may not be notable. G1  gg  y  !  04:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.