Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/May/8

Cult-film-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge with film-stub

The parent category,, was deleted at CfD on April 11, so this stub category and template seem inappropriate. (The category was deleted because the lack of a clear definition of "cult" made it difficult to set proper inclusion criteria). I suggest merging to film-stub /.

was nominated for deletion at today's CfD, but withdrawn to allow the discussion to be moved to SfD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with film-stub without redirect. (Clarifying intention as nominator). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - per nom. I nominated the cat originally at CFD. With the deletion of the Cult films category there is no logic in maintaining the stub category since, if un-stubified, there would be no cult film category to house the expanded articles. Otto4711 13:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Do we even have 60 stub articles on films about cults? ;) Caerwine Caer’s whines 17:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge/delete

Kabbalah-stub was created as an upmerged template this time last month, with the proviso that it would eventually get its own category when it proved to have enough stubs. A month on, someone has created the category although there are a mere 11 stubs. There is clearly no need for a separate category yet - even with a wikiproject a minimum of 30 stubs shuld be present before there is a category. reupmerge the template/delete the category. Grutness...wha?  00:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.