Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/October/21

Baseball stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Unproposed badly formed duplicate of Baseball-stub, brought to you by User:Someguyudontknow, who is becoming a little bit of a problem (this is one of four recent creations by this editor that have appeared here). Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Fork of established template that doesn't conform with the naming system. No longer used. Valentinian T / C 20:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unused and redundant to Baseball-stub. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   15:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

South america-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Unproposed badly formed duplicate, brought to you by User:Someguyudontknow, as above. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Fork of established template that doesn't conform with the naming system. No longer used. Valentinian T / C 20:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unused and goes against naming conventions. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   15:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Brazil stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Unproposed badly formed duplicate, brought to you by User:Someguyudontknow, as above. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * What should I use instead? Why is it "badly formed"? A.Z. 02:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The long-established Brazil-stub or one of its subtypes. As far as the formatting's concerned, the name is non-standard - check the stub naming conventions for the problems with the name format. In the case of some of the other templates created by the same user listed above there are also other problems with formatting. Grutness...wha?  06:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Fork of established template that doesn't conform with the naming system. No longer used. Valentinian T / C 20:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Goes against naming conventions and redundant to Brazil-stub. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   15:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Muni-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename, upmerge


 * Unproposed stub type for...Rio Muni? Paul Muni? Munitions, maybe? No - this says it feeds into the equally misnamed (also nominated). In fact, it feeds directly into ! If needed at all it will need some drastic renaming and reworking, but given that the parent category  (which isn't actually cureently listed as such), has fewer than 40 articles (and, peculiarly, some half a dozen templates!), this seems extremely doubtful. Even in every single one of those articles were a stub, this wouldn't reach threshold. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename I should have been more specific. It represents San Francisco Municipal Railway. - Go od  sh op 05:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It feeds into CAT:STUBS? How do I set it to go to my category? - Go od  sh op 05:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've fixed that bit up - you put followed by a comment. The noinclude shouldn't have been there, the categort should have been the proper target one rather than, and the note wasn't necessary or standard for a stub template). Size is still likely to be a problem though - there certainly aren't likely to be 60 current stubs. Grutness...wha?  05:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Would this be covered by a Californian or US subtype of, or are we still puzzling over the precise scope of that whole hierachy? Rename the template, upmerge it...  somewhere, and delete the category.  Alai 06:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.