Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/October/9

Gesnariaceae-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete

Could someone speedy delete these please?? I slipped up on the spelling and have now created the CORRECT template and category. Sheesh. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 18:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * ...and with such an easy word to spell, too ;) Done. Grutness...wha?  23:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

TZ-actor-stub (redlink)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename, upmerge, delete redirect

While the idea of a separate actor-stub for each country is a reasonable one, this one is in serious need of a rename and upmerge, with the current name not kept as a redirect. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * While I've seen worse, in that I at least guessed right, TZ is far from unambiguous. Move, upmerge, and delete redirect, per nom.  Alai 01:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Astronomical-surveys-stub / (redlinked permcat)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename/rescope to astronomical-catalogue-stub/Astronomical catalogue stubs

Unproposed, no text at all, the only category is a misnamed permcat (no stubcat link of any kind), and the template is misnamed with plural adjectival form. If kept - upmerged - it should be at astronomy-survey-stub, but with fewer than 60 articles in the (correctly named, lowercase) permcat (of which, cattersect shows only 18 in ), it seems hardly necessary. Grutness...wha?  00:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The permcat being groped for is, I believe. Could this be further renamed and upscoped (rather than upmerged) to ?  The astronomies are hovering around the magic officially oversized number, so additional subtypes are probably a good plan.  Alai 01:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * sounds reasonable to me. Grutness...wha?  23:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.