Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/September/11

Even-toed-ungulate-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to eventoedungulate-stub, keeping redirect

Non-standard, non-NG name - this is not a subtype of Toed-ungulate-stub (all ungulates have toes, AFAIK) - yet the name suggests that it would be. Rename to Eventoed-ungulate-stub. Grutness...wha?  00:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * To be picky -- dare I say, even pickier -- it's not a subtype of ungulate-stub either, since that doesn't exist. Though it could be, and would be if that actually existed.  There's a lot of such issues lurking out there, that one could tie oneself in knots thinking about, and could cause a lot of frustration when trying to play 'guess the template' if one is doing it "from cold", rather than in a batch from the parent.  I'm inclined to say move to eventoedungulate-stub, but keep redirect, to avoid such unnecessary second-guessing.  And maybe create an additional one at eventoed-ungulate-stub, by much the same token.  Alai 02:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * We should move it up the hierarchy of stubs to ungulate-stub since that would prove most useful to the categorization of mammals. Ungulates have two main sub-groups, even-toed ungulates & odd-toed ungulates, but the number of even-toed species dwarf the odd-toed to such an extent that it's really not worth having a distinction. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leaf-nosed-bat-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to leafnosed-bat-stub

Non-standard, non-NG name - this is not a subtype of Nosed-bat-stub (all bats have noses, AFAIK) - yet the name suggests that it would be. Rename to Leafnosed-bat-stub. Grutness...wha?  00:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this is different from even-toed-ungulate-stub, which isn't a kind of toed-ungulate-stub. Od Mishehu 21:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well spotted - that's a non-standard as well, now listed above. Grutness...wha?  00:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.