Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/September/12

rasta-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. -- Amalas 14:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

See previous discussion here. Category now has 58 items. I have no opinion; I just want to close out the Discoveries section. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Still the same mess it was before, with a load of disparate articles only linked tenuously by their connection to rastafarianism - in many cases a very weak link indeed. Many of the articles in here would be far better served by a reggae-musician-stub or reggae-band-stub. Having them in here is similar to adding judaism-stub to Kletzmer groups. If we needed a rasta-stub, it would be for the rastafarian faith itself, not for music connected to it. Grutness...wha?  05:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pr-stub, PR-stub, Pr-company-stub and PR-company-stub all feed into

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge PR-company-stub, delete rest

Only 11 items among them since January. Delete for now. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Upmerge PR-company-stub to company stub, either delete "PR-stub" or upmerge to advertisement stubs and upscope it to advertising stubs, delete the others. Grutness...wha?  05:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you nominating just the templates, or also the category? Currently, none seem to actually be tagged.  Grutness's plan sounds about right, though.  Alai 06:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops. Both. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 16:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge

Has had only 9 articles since June. Upmerge. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 03:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per nom. Grutness...wha?  05:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Upmerge. Very few articles and the area covered is too narrow.  Tbo 157   talk  19:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.