Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/September/28

La Rioja-geo-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename and upmerge

Unproposed, spacey template; unproposed, underpopulated category. Template name, by stub naming guidelines, should be LaRiojaES-geo-stub - and it should be either populated or upmerged. Grutness...wha?  01:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd convinced myself we already had templates for every autonomous community (without troubling to actually check, or indeed count), so I'm a little surprised we didn't already have a template for this, so I'm not too put-out by the 'unproposed' aspect. Rename, and populated or upmerge, on NG and "numerosity" grounds, per nom.  Permcat is at, btw, so I'd favour a rename either way to achieve some sort of consistency (though upmerging would make that moot as far as the stubcat is concerned).  Alai 04:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like another case of "permcat at one name, article at another". There is a La Rioja Province in Argentina, BTW, so perhaps the permcat needs changing. Grutness...wha?  00:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a plausible theory of the case from where I'm sitting. Alai 16:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I've taken the permcat to CFD for renaming. Grutness...wha?  22:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wallis Futuna-bio-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename and upmerge

Both unproposed - and created at the same time, apparently - there are very very few Wallis and Futuna stubs - certainly nowhere near threshold - so, like other similar cases, this should be upmerged. As for the template, it needs renaming if kept, to the spaceless NG-standard WallisFutuna-bio-stub. Grutness...wha?  01:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.